Grand Challenges for Engineering  -  Feb 08, 2010

Section Navigator
21st Century Innovations

By Eugene S. Meieran, Senior Intel Fellow at Intel Corp. in Chandler, Ariz.

Here is a brief history of my trying to generate a list of remarkable technology challenges for the 21st century, to be presented to the National Academy of Engineering in 2101, by the first person (a Purdue graduate, of course) to step onto the surface of Mars.

I decided to create this list after listening to Neil Armstrong give a presentation on this topic of the 20th Century Great Innovations, followed by publication of the book, "A Century of Innovation".  I thought it was such an impressive list and book that I decided to make a list for the 21st century, based on the same criteria; technology that significantly benefits human society.  Incidentally, I have purchased and given away maybe 50 of these books, as prizes for innovation, for recognition of innovation talks and presentations, etc. It is a fabulous book!

Three things impressed me about the 20th century list:
1. The benefits were largely universal, affecting people across the globe and at all economic levels (even if large groups of people were unable to reap these benefits).
2. The technologies were diverse and depended on the timely parallel accomplishments of science, particularly quantum theory, nuclear physics and relativity, along with the outstanding achievements in mathematics and medicine.
3. The devices that enabled all these innovations, telephones, airplanes, computers power plants, automobiles, generators, motors, etc., were made in such quantity and quality that they were affordable by large numbers of people, thus making them relatively universally available.  Their development and exploitation depended for the most part on the economic wealth generated by the capital assets devoted to their manufacture and distribution; oil wells, iron ore mines, factories, ship and railroads, etc.

So I developed my first list, unranked (the 20th century list, given below, was ranked in order of benefit to society over the 100 years of the 20th century).

20th Century Innovation Topics
1. Electrification
2. Automobile
3. Airplane
4. Water supply and distribution
5. Electronics
6. Radio and television
7. Agricultural mechanization
8. Computers
9. Telephone
10. Air conditioning/refrigeration
11. Interstate highways
12. Space flight
13. Internet
14. Imaging
15. Household appliances
16. Health technologies
17. Petrochemical technology
18. Laser and fiber optics
19. Nuclear technologies
20. High-performance materials

I used this list in my talks about innovation, at universities, conferences, industrial seminars, etc.  The list was revised as people made suggestions, and sub-topics being a little more granular in content were added.  I've given varieties of this talk at Purdue, Malaysia, MIT, Kansas State, various universities in China, in Israel, as well as at several major professional conferences.  These talks are available if one wants a copy.

Eventually, I presented this list to what we call an Industrial Fellows Forum in November 2006; a forum made up of Fellows and Fellow program managers, representing about 27 industrial concerns and represented by 45 Fellows/program managers.  We then edited the list, added more sub-topics and voted on the list, in terms of TOP, MIDDLE and BOTTOM innovative domains, although realizing that even the BOTTOM topics had much merit in a list of 21 topics for the 21st century (rather than 20 topics for the 20th century.  We actually have 22 topics; when all the votes are in, we will list the top 21 in priority order.

Personally, I see some topics that currently are low on the list, which follows, that seem to me to be too low: AI and robotics, Space Exploration, Preservation of History and Species, for example. But the list is prioritized in voting order.

In parallel to the 20th century list, there are some obvious relationships.  For example, the 20th century list depended on the providing of cheap power through electrification, capital assets such as factories, mines, oil wells and refineries, to be impactful; the 21st century list seems to be dependent on providing knowledge resources through the Internet, and computers and communication devices, to be impactful (e.g., weather prediction and control, traffic and logistics, terrorism and security, etc., all depend on availability of vast sources of knowledge and rapid dissemination of this knowledge to the right, connected people).  So as the 20th century was dominated by physical capital and lots of physical objects, the 21st century will be dominated by intellectual capital and lots of virtual objects.

Of course, this list will be wrong; had the 20th century list been created in 1907, the automobile, airplane, telephone, even nuclear power, might have been envisioned as important, but certainly the Internet, the computer and many appliances would not have been even thought of.  So my list is likely to be wrong; who knows what magic will be developed in 2069 that will be earth-shattering in its ability to improve the quality of life throughout the world!

But the list is what it is, and is given below, in priority order.

21st Century Innovation Topics
1. Energy conservation
2. Resource protection
3. Food and water production and distribution
4. Waste management
5. Education and learning
6. Medicine and prolonging life
7. Security and counter-terrorism
8. New technology
9. Genetics and cloning
10. Global communication
11. Traffic and population logistics
12. Knowledge sharing
13. Integrated electronic environment
14. Globalization
15. AI, interfaces and robotics
16. Weather prediction and control
17. Sustainable development
18. Entertainment
19. Space exploration
20. "Virtualization" and VR
21. Preservation of history
22. Preservation of species 

(I have sub-topics for each; for example, resource protection includes gas, liquid, solid, radioactive, hazardous, etc. components.  And each of these sub-topics can be further subdivided, to specifically identifiable programs.  I have intended to do this in further iterations of the list).


References
Constable, George, and Somerville, Bob. 2003. A Century of Innovation: Twenty Engineering Achievements that Transformed our Lives. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press. With a forward by Neil Armstrong and an afterward by Arthur C. Clarke. Available online at <http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10726.html>.



Every comment submitted to this fully moderated discussion has to be reviewed by an engineeringchallenges.org moderator before it is published on the site. Please keep your contributions civil, tasteful, and relevant. All comments must comply with our terms of use.

Submit a Comment

Name  
Location  
Email (optional)

Comment  
Submit

Comments

Cendikit, Brunsfels

"" 

In this century we should not focus on global warming, that is something humans cannot control. If the polar ice caps melt, thats no problem, the penguins and polar bears can move to another location. Such as South America's tip, or in Greenland. The thing we need to focus on in our present time is virtuality. This is becoming a severe problem, if humans keep "plugging in" to computers or something of the like, then they will (over time) lose muscle tone. Then bone structure will falter and we will crumble into piles of jelly.

sourabh, india

"" 

I Think waste material are very useful for any thing like wastage material are use as fertilizer.

Cloud Sanny, Poland

"" 

In the 21st, I think we should first fix what we want to reach, where we are going and why this effort is deployed. Are we still progressing towards "Making Life easier and healthier for Next Generation, our Offsprings"? People seem to me to forget about the real purpose of the creation of Money that is nowadays just put in the center of everything we do; Economy and Economy and again Economy. People even countries just want to have without thinking for a while, what their competition and race are for. Some of us have even great ideas of producing straight away Money (e.g. Wall Street's hunters) instead of making it as a reward for doing something important for the society. Products & Services with Companies and great inventors but Money with Hunters who decide of the flow of this last. It is clear that a Money hunter will not invest in progressive inventions but in monetary ones of his/her interest. Then bankruptcy of companies, redundancy of employees and great inventors such as Tesla without satisfaction. The last ones on the list remain the money hunters who finally will not have what to buy even what to invest in unless suicide in some cases as born only for money. The latest crisis is the proof. Was it the assumption of all the 20th Century effort? We are all now confused in the chosen direction. Let's reverse course honestly. Let's fix clearly limits. What are Science & technology for? What's the upper limit of Medicine? I think the death cure, death being a disease as anyone else. Then the problem of overcrowding on Earth. And then the problem of finding in Space the second Earth or planet similar to it. This will mark the Total Peace Era -TPE for at least million years. They all think of great life; I think the greatest remains undone. (C.O.D. Sanny).

brian schreifels, burnsville, monnesota

"" 

Under the 21st Century Innovation Topics: the only topics should be are: Energy conservation, Resource protection, Food and water production, Waste management, Education, Knowledge sharing, Preservation of history, Preservation of species, and the world putting their egoes to the side and come together so that the world survives. And stop spending money on things that are not as important, then these. Because by 2012 when the sun heats the earth far more then we will only have our selves to blame and nothing else because we could have stoped it a long time ago, but people got lazy.

Tom Hughes, Michigan, USA

"" 

First commenter,Timothy. : Oh but there is at least 2 processes for plastic back to oil processes and I am in favor of the one designed by the Lady Professor from India. It returns all plastic products back to oil and just needs to be engaged here. They sell the oil there for boilers.Simple and sweet,just needs to be engaged with my trash system and its all a go,old stuff and all with no major labor costs to outlay. My trash system will revolutionize the process and take care of certain other problems also.Not much engineering needed ,just process engagement.

Timothy Arthur O'Brien, Austin, Texas

"...reclamation of buried potentially toxic waste, particularly buried plastics and non-biodegradab le adhesives..." 

I am unable to say that I'm stunned at your omission, because until recently I wasn't too concerned about it either. But starting a few years ago, I have become increasingly obsessed with what I now believe is the primary engineering challenge of the 21st century -- reclamation of buried potentially toxic waste, particularly buried plastics and non-biodegradable adhesives. Along with that, the design of economically feasible biodegradable plastics alternatives. I think that we are all sufferring the effects of massive psychological denial -- we know that our drink bottles, product packaging, and short life consumer goods are often not biodegradable, and we are burying them at an incredible rate, such that in only a little over fifty years the whole planet is covered in piles of the stuff. It won't go away by itself, and I have no reason to believe that the material won't become toxic and potentially carcinogenic at some point in its biodegredation. If we follow a barrel of oil from an embattled field overseas, through the plant where it becomes packaging, on the truck to the store, then to the consumer's house, then to another truck where it is carried to a landfill and buried in a form that cannot be reclaimed by nature, we see the insanity that might explain world wars one, two, and three. When will engineers refuse to work with the material in a strong enough way that affects industry, or at least give us some reason to hope that there is a plan to eventually exhume and reprocess buried petrochemical materials?

Greg Junge, Galena, Illinois

"...the root problem/challen ge - human population control and sustainability." 

I think many of your items refer indirectly to, but don't define the root problem/challenge - human population control and sustainability. This may be a self-correcting condition. As all of the technological innovations enable longer life and increased population, will the earth become overpopulated to the point that the environment will no longer support human life? Will we become so numerous that we will use up natural resources and foul the environment to such a degree that the population will be reduced by disease, famine, war? This sounds more biblical than technological. Greg Junge

RAY WILSON, BRISBANE

"" 

Hi. I was given this website in one of Engineers Australia periodicals; and it seems very interesting. I am working on a study into an open-sea method of ship loading; cape size; coal, iron ore and so on. However there is concern that the information relating to the methodology cannot be released because it is world-first and the intellectual property of the Company I work for. What is your comment to this? Regards, Ray Wilson Mech Eng.

National Academy of Engineering
500 Fifth Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20001  |  T. 202.334.3200  |  F. 202.334.2290
The National Academies Logo
© Copyright 2010 National Academy of Engineering. All Rights Reserved.